<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boot from Paravirtualized SCSI Adapter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virtu-al.net/2009/12/02/boot-from-paravirtualized-scsi-adapter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2009/12/02/boot-from-paravirtualized-scsi-adapter/</link>
	<description>Virtually everything is poshable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 08:53:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silver</title>
		<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2009/12/02/boot-from-paravirtualized-scsi-adapter/comment-page-1/#comment-2456</link>
		<dc:creator>Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtu-al.net/?p=1183#comment-2456</guid>
		<description>I would like to share couple of things I ran into when I tried to convert boot disk to PVSCSI. 
Same case has been reported to Vmware support. 

The article is here. 
http://geeksilver.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/upgrade-esx-3-5-to-vsphere-fixing-part-1-5/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to share couple of things I ran into when I tried to convert boot disk to PVSCSI.<br />
Same case has been reported to Vmware support. </p>
<p>The article is here.<br />
<a href="http://geeksilver.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/upgrade-esx-3-5-to-vsphere-fixing-part-1-5/" rel="nofollow">http://geeksilver.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/upgrade-esx-3-5-to-vsphere-fixing-part-1-5/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtu-Al</title>
		<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2009/12/02/boot-from-paravirtualized-scsi-adapter/comment-page-1/#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtu-Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtu-al.net/?p=1183#comment-1992</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, that is really interesting, I am deploying soem Citrix boxes at the moment and whilst I havent done a direct side by side comparison it certainly seams faster to use from the user perspective, perhaps I will have to delve deeper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, that is really interesting, I am deploying soem Citrix boxes at the moment and whilst I havent done a direct side by side comparison it certainly seams faster to use from the user perspective, perhaps I will have to delve deeper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney de Pater</title>
		<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2009/12/02/boot-from-paravirtualized-scsi-adapter/comment-page-1/#comment-1991</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney de Pater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtu-al.net/?p=1183#comment-1991</guid>
		<description>There has been some follow up performance reports (http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&amp;cmd=displayKC&amp;externalId=1017652) that show that the pvSCSI adapter may not be the best choice for low IO VMs due to IO coalescing. And the thresholds are substantial.

 &quot;..The test results show that PVSCSI is better than LSI Logic, except under one condition--the virtual machine is performing less than 2,000 IOPS and issuing greater than 4 outstanding I/Os...&quot;

Perhaps some perspective - you can expect that for every heavy email user, Exchange will typically generate 1/2 IOPS, so you will need 4000 heavy email users loaded up on an Exchange VM to really take advantage of the pvSCSI adapter.

Now those VMs that trickle feed IO, and with the adapter having to wait for IO to coalesce before dropping it on the (virtual) wire, pvSCSI may introduce additional IO latency.

pvSCSI is brilliant however, as with any tool, needs to be employed appropriately…

Average VMs will be fine with the LSI Logic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been some follow up performance reports (<a href="http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&amp;cmd=displayKC&amp;externalId=1017652" rel="nofollow">http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&amp;cmd=displayKC&amp;externalId=1017652</a>) that show that the pvSCSI adapter may not be the best choice for low IO VMs due to IO coalescing. And the thresholds are substantial.</p>
<p> &#8220;..The test results show that PVSCSI is better than LSI Logic, except under one condition&#8211;the virtual machine is performing less than 2,000 IOPS and issuing greater than 4 outstanding I/Os&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps some perspective &#8211; you can expect that for every heavy email user, Exchange will typically generate 1/2 IOPS, so you will need 4000 heavy email users loaded up on an Exchange VM to really take advantage of the pvSCSI adapter.</p>
<p>Now those VMs that trickle feed IO, and with the adapter having to wait for IO to coalesce before dropping it on the (virtual) wire, pvSCSI may introduce additional IO latency.</p>
<p>pvSCSI is brilliant however, as with any tool, needs to be employed appropriately…</p>
<p>Average VMs will be fine with the LSI Logic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMware: Paravirtualisierter SCSI Adapter &#124; linuxvoodoo.de</title>
		<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2009/12/02/boot-from-paravirtualized-scsi-adapter/comment-page-1/#comment-1922</link>
		<dc:creator>VMware: Paravirtualisierter SCSI Adapter &#124; linuxvoodoo.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtu-al.net/?p=1183#comment-1922</guid>
		<description>[...] schönes HowTo mit Screenshots habe ich auf www.virtu-al.net gefunden. ... other posts by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] schönes HowTo mit Screenshots habe ich auf <a href="http://www.virtu-al.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.virtu-al.net</a> gefunden. &#8230; other posts by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NiTRo</title>
		<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2009/12/02/boot-from-paravirtualized-scsi-adapter/comment-page-1/#comment-1747</link>
		<dc:creator>NiTRo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtu-al.net/?p=1183#comment-1747</guid>
		<description>Here is another way to do it without dummy disk (driver injection) http://www.hypervisor.fr/?p=1764</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another way to do it without dummy disk (driver injection) <a href="http://www.hypervisor.fr/?p=1764" rel="nofollow">http://www.hypervisor.fr/?p=1764</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Migration PVSCSI automatisée - Hypervisor.fr</title>
		<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2009/12/02/boot-from-paravirtualized-scsi-adapter/comment-page-1/#comment-1746</link>
		<dc:creator>Migration PVSCSI automatisée - Hypervisor.fr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtu-al.net/?p=1183#comment-1746</guid>
		<description>[...] effet, comme le décrit Alan sur son blog, la solution la plus facile consiste à rebooter avec un disque temporaire sur un nouveau [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] effet, comme le décrit Alan sur son blog, la solution la plus facile consiste à rebooter avec un disque temporaire sur un nouveau [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P2V conversion tips and tricks &#171; UP2V</title>
		<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2009/12/02/boot-from-paravirtualized-scsi-adapter/comment-page-1/#comment-1720</link>
		<dc:creator>P2V conversion tips and tricks &#171; UP2V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 13:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtu-al.net/?p=1183#comment-1720</guid>
		<description>[...] You might want to take advantage of the latest drivers for virtual SCSI adapters and virtual nic&#8217;s available in vSphere 4. To replace the buslogic parallel scsi adapter by the paravirtualized scsi adapter (PVSCSI). This adapter supports if Update 1 is used, also booting from the Paravirtual SCSI adapter. To replace the default SCSI adapter after the conversion has ended, follow the instructions published on http://www.virtu-al.net/2009/12/02/boot-from-paravirtualized-scsi-adapter/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You might want to take advantage of the latest drivers for virtual SCSI adapters and virtual nic&#8217;s available in vSphere 4. To replace the buslogic parallel scsi adapter by the paravirtualized scsi adapter (PVSCSI). This adapter supports if Update 1 is used, also booting from the Paravirtual SCSI adapter. To replace the default SCSI adapter after the conversion has ended, follow the instructions published on <a href="http://www.virtu-al.net/2009/12/02/boot-from-paravirtualized-scsi-adapter/" rel="nofollow">http://www.virtu-al.net/2009/12/02/boot-from-paravirtualized-scsi-adapter/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtu-Al</title>
		<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2009/12/02/boot-from-paravirtualized-scsi-adapter/comment-page-1/#comment-1593</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtu-Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtu-al.net/?p=1183#comment-1593</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1587&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Carl Skow &lt;/a&gt; 
Thanks, thats useful to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1587" rel="nofollow">@Carl Skow </a><br />
Thanks, thats useful to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Skow</title>
		<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2009/12/02/boot-from-paravirtualized-scsi-adapter/comment-page-1/#comment-1587</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Skow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtu-al.net/?p=1183#comment-1587</guid>
		<description>I just verified with VMware support that pvscsi adapters (as well as vmxnet adapters) are still not compatible with Fault Tolerance. Just a caveat to be aware of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just verified with VMware support that pvscsi adapters (as well as vmxnet adapters) are still not compatible with Fault Tolerance. Just a caveat to be aware of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Skow</title>
		<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2009/12/02/boot-from-paravirtualized-scsi-adapter/comment-page-1/#comment-1579</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Skow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtu-al.net/?p=1183#comment-1579</guid>
		<description>Has anyone verified that you can still enable FT with a pvscsi adapter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone verified that you can still enable FT with a pvscsi adapter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
