<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtualising XenApp &#8211; What&#8217;s the magic number ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virtu-al.net/2010/02/26/virtualising-xenapp-whats-the-magic-number/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2010/02/26/virtualising-xenapp-whats-the-magic-number/</link>
	<description>Virtually everything is poshable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:14:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2010/02/26/virtualising-xenapp-whats-the-magic-number/#comment-1983</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtu-al.net/?p=1490#comment-1983</guid>
		<description>Brian - Good to hear that you&#039;re getting such good numbers on 2008 with XA5. We see significantly less - around 15 users on a VM with 2 vCPUs and 8GB of RAM before the CPU is pegged.

As always it all depends on what applications you&#039;re running..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian &#8211; Good to hear that you&#8217;re getting such good numbers on 2008 with XA5. We see significantly less &#8211; around 15 users on a VM with 2 vCPUs and 8GB of RAM before the CPU is pegged.</p>
<p>As always it all depends on what applications you&#8217;re running..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2010/02/26/virtualising-xenapp-whats-the-magic-number/#comment-1951</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtu-al.net/?p=1490#comment-1951</guid>
		<description>We have seen about the same numbers for PS4 on 2K3. 
So far on 2K8 with XA5 we can get around 50 users on VM&#039;s with good performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have seen about the same numbers for PS4 on 2K3.<br />
So far on 2K8 with XA5 we can get around 50 users on VM&#8217;s with good performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2010/02/26/virtualising-xenapp-whats-the-magic-number/#comment-1898</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtu-al.net/?p=1490#comment-1898</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by alanrenouf: New blog post: Virtualising XenApp What&#039;s the magic number ? http://bit.ly/arePss...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by alanrenouf: New blog post: Virtualising XenApp What&#8217;s the magic number ? <a href="http://bit.ly/arePss.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/arePss..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2010/02/26/virtualising-xenapp-whats-the-magic-number/#comment-1895</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtu-al.net/?p=1490#comment-1895</guid>
		<description>Thank you for deciding to write on this topic.
Please realize that not everyone will use XD vs. XA, and that not everyone has the Advanced/Enterprise versions.
We presently can get up to 45-50 users (a bit slow) on PS 4.0 on our physical servers, we have 3 of them, usually with 25-30 users running very comfortably.
I would be encouraged to know if I can get 20-25 users per virtualized XA server on ESX, then I would know I need at least 4 Citrix hosts.
Thank you, Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for deciding to write on this topic.<br />
Please realize that not everyone will use XD vs. XA, and that not everyone has the Advanced/Enterprise versions.<br />
We presently can get up to 45-50 users (a bit slow) on PS 4.0 on our physical servers, we have 3 of them, usually with 25-30 users running very comfortably.<br />
I would be encouraged to know if I can get 20-25 users per virtualized XA server on ESX, then I would know I need at least 4 Citrix hosts.<br />
Thank you, Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.virtu-al.net/2010/02/26/virtualising-xenapp-whats-the-magic-number/#comment-1893</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtu-al.net/?p=1490#comment-1893</guid>
		<description>I hope you&#039;ll put some focus on Server 2008 and the differences in user densities that you may see as compared to Server 2003.  I&#039;m seeing much higher CPU utilization on XA 5/Server 2008 than I did with Server 2003, which is hurting user density.

Looking forward to your articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you&#8217;ll put some focus on Server 2008 and the differences in user densities that you may see as compared to Server 2003.  I&#8217;m seeing much higher CPU utilization on XA 5/Server 2008 than I did with Server 2003, which is hurting user density.</p>
<p>Looking forward to your articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

